Supreme court on chemical weapons treaty

The Supreme Court on Monday collectively rejected the justice department effort to expand the Chemical Weapons Convention’s reach into garden variety domestic crimes, throwing out the federal conviction of Pennsylvania woman who used a chemical irritant to get back at a romantic rival. After this the Chemical Weapons Convention, implemented through a 1998 law, deals with the crimes of deadly seriousness, Chief justice Roberts wrote for the court, rejecting its use to prosecute a minor assault. The ruling maintained the government’s ability to use the treaty when going after major crimes, including acts of terrorism. Prosecutors have invoked the treaty in domestic cases involving a plot to attack a federal courthouse and the detonation of a homemade chlorine bomb among others. The federal government unquestionably has a substantial interest in enforcing criminal laws against assassination, terrorism, Justice Roberts said nothing we said here will disrupt the government’s authority to prosecute such offenses. Federal authorities had used the statue to prosecute Carol Ann bond, a microbiologist from Lansdale, PA, who had sought revenge after discovering her best friend Myrlinda Haynes, had become pregnant my Ms. Bond’s husband, with Ms. Bond be very upset Ms Bond put irritating chemicals on Ms. Hayne’s car door, mailbox and doorknob, hoping to cause an uncomfortable rash to Ms. Haynes. With uses of this chemical the young lady receives six years in prison and strenghting the state law of crime with the uses of chemicals


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s